Chest Wall Mobility: Identification of Underlying Predictors.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify factors contributing to normal mobility or hypermobility of the chest wall. METHODS: Seventy-eight young adults were divided into 2 groups: patients with normal mobility (group 1, n = 40) and hypermobility of the chest wall (group 2, n = 38). The mean mobility of the chest wall in groups 1 and 2 was 9.9 and 6.1 cm, respectively. The mean age of groups 1 and 2 was 22.2 and 21.5 years, respectively. The Brief Symptom Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Perceived Stress Scale were used to evaluate the psychometric properties. Quality of life was assessed using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Smoking status was determined via self-report of current smoking status. Chest wall mobility was measured using thoracic and axillary cirtometry. Pulmonary functions were evaluated using a Spirobank II device. Subsequently, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, and forced expiratory flow 25% to 75% were verified. Carefusion Micro RPM and the 6-minute walk test were used to evaluate maximal respiratory pressures and functional capacity, respectively. RESULTS: With backward linear regression models, FVC and obsessive-compulsive traits were significant predictors of chest wall mobility (R²â€¯= 0.27; P < .001 and P = .01, respectively). In logistic regression models, FVC, maximum inspiratory pressure, and obsessive-compulsive traits were significant predictors of normal mobility/hypermobility of the chest wall (R²â€¯= 0.42; P < .001, P = .01, and P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSION: Forced vital capacity, maximum inspiratory pressure, and obsessive-compulsive traits are significant predictors of chest wall mobility and normal mobility or hypermobility of the chest wall.

Comparison of Three Manual Therapy Techniques as Trigger Point Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Objectives: This pilot study aimed to compare the efficacy of manual pressure release (MPR), strain counterstrain (SCS), and integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) in the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP). Design: Single-blind, randomized, controlled pilot trial. Setting: Neurosurgery clinic. Subjects: Forty-eight patients (46 women; mean age, 35.47 ± 10.58 years) diagnosed chronic nonspecific LBP and who had at least one active myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the quadratus lumborum, iliocostalis lumborum, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and gluteus minimus muscles were included. Interventions: Patients received a standard home exercise program in addition to the MPR technique (MPR group), SCS technique (SCS group), and INIT (INIT group) for 12 sessions (2 days/week for 6 weeks). Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were MTrP examination, pressure pain threshold, lumbar active range of motion, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck depression inventory, and state-trait anxiety inventory. Results: There is no significant difference in terms of the percentage of deactivated MTrPs after 1st session and 12th session between groups (p > 0.05), but the percentage of deactivated MTrPs was less in MPR group than other groups. The overall group-by-time interaction for the repeated measures analysis of variance was not significant for primary and secondary outcomes (p > 0.05), but the improvement in the VAS-activity and the ODI was slightly better in the SCS group compared with other groups. Conclusions: These preliminary findings, which might help provide a glimpse into the clinical effectiveness of three manual therapy techniques (MPR, SCS, and INIT) rather than statistical significance, indicated that SCS or INIT might provide slightly better improvement in pain during activity, deactivation of MTrPs, and disability related to pain in chronic nonspecific LBP.

Stretching exercises combined with ischemic compression in pectoralis minor muscle with latent trigger points: A single-blind, randomized, controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Latent trigger points (LTrPs) in the pectoralis minor (PM) muscle lead to muscle tightness. This study aimed to investigate which type of stretching exercise used after ischemic compression (IC) was more effective on LTrPs in the PM muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty participants with PM muscle tightness and an LTrP in the PM muscle were divided among groups 1 (IC with modified contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching), 2 (IC with static stretching), 3 (IC with myofascial release) and 4 (no intervention). The PM muscle index (PMI), PM length (PML), rounded shoulder posture, pressure pain threshold, pulmonary function, and maximal respiratory pressure were evaluated. RESULTS: Improvement in the PMI and PML was found immediately after the intervention in groups 1 and 3 compared with baseline (p = 0.01). The overall group-by-time interaction in the repeated measures analysis of variance was significant for the PMI in favor of Group 1 (F1, 36 = 3.53, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: IC may be followed by contract-relax PNF stretching to increase the length of PM muscle with LTrPs.

The effectiveness of trigger point treatment in rotator cuff pathology: A randomized controlled double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have emphasized the importance of the presence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in patients with rotator cuff pathologies and the high frequency of MTrPs in rotator cuff muscles. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment of active MTrPs in patients with rotator cuff pathologies. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with rotator cuff tear were randomized into two groups. All patients received the same standard conservative treatment twice a week for 6 weeks. Patients in Group 1 additionally received ischemic compression (IC) of MTrPs. Pain, range of motion (ROM), function, and anxiety and depression were assessed. MTrPs in rotator cuff muscles were assessed manually, and the number of MTrPs on the shoulder complex was counted. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of changes in resting/activity/night pain, ROM, function, or anxiety and depression (p> 0.05). Pain scores improved only in Group 1. However, the total number of MTrPs was significantly decreased in Group 1 (p= 0.001). CONCLUSION: A six-week course of IC helps treat active MTrPs. A standard conservative treatment program reduced pain and increased function; the addition of MTrP treatment did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with rotator cuff pathologies.

A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES:: To compare the different stretching techniques, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and static stretching, in patients with elbow stiffness after a treated elbow fracture. DESIGN:: Randomized-controlled, single-blind study. SETTING:: Department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation. SUBJECTS:: Forty patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness (24 women; mean age, 41.34 ± 7.57 years). INTERVENTION:: PNF stretching group ( n = 20), hold-relax PNF stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks); static stretching group ( n = 20), static stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks). MAIN MEASURES:: The primary outcome is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The secondary outcomes are active range of motion (AROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Short Form-12 and Global Rating of Change. Participants were assessed at baseline, after a six-week intervention period and one-month later (follow-up). RESULTS:: After treatment, improvement in the mean DASH score was slightly better in the PNF stretching group (8.66 ± 6.15) compared with the static stretching group (19.25 ± 10.30) ( p = 0.03). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 × 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was also significant for elbow flexion AROM (mean change for PNF stretching group; static stretching group; 41.10, 34.42, p = 0.04), VAS-rest (-1.31, -1.08, p = 0.03) and VAS-activity (-3.78, -3.47, p = 0.01) in favour of PNF stretching group. The other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION:: The study demonstrated that the structured exercise programme combined with PNF stretching might be effective in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness with regard to improving function, elbow flexion AROM, pain at rest and during activity.